Lusha vs Hired
A detailed comparison of Lusha and Hired. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.
Lusha
B2B contact and company data platform that provides verified emails, phone numbers, and company intelligence for sales and recruiting teams.
Rating
4.3/5
Best for
All
Free trial
No
Free plan
Yes
Hired
Job matching marketplace for technology roles where pre-vetted candidates receive interview requests from companies, inverting the traditional application process.
Rating
4.3/5
Best for
Mid-Market
Free trial
No
Free plan
No
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Lusha | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| AI Candidate Matching | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| Bulk Messaging | ||
| Email Templates | ||
| API Access | ||
| Boolean Search | ||
| Chrome Extension | ||
| LinkedIn Integration |
Pricing Comparison
Lusha
Free
Free
Pro
$49/mo
Premium
$79/mo
Scale
Custom
Hired
Platform
Custom
Pros & Cons
Lusha
Pros
- +Quick, accurate contact data from LinkedIn
- +Affordable pricing with a free tier
- +Simple Chrome extension
- +GDPR-compliant data sourcing
Cons
- -Credit system can be limiting
- -Some contact data may be outdated
- -More sales-focused than recruiting-focused
- -Limited candidate engagement features
Hired
Pros
- +Curated talent marketplace for tech roles
- +Pay-per-hire model reduces upfront risk
- +Pre-vetted candidate profiles with salary data
- +Strong for engineering and tech hiring
Cons
- -Limited to tech roles only
- -Cost per hire can be high
- -Smaller candidate pool than LinkedIn
- -Not suitable for non-tech positions
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Lusha if:
- • You want to start with a free plan
- • Quick, accurate contact data from LinkedIn
Choose Hired if:
- • Your company is Mid-Market size
- • Curated talent marketplace for tech roles