Remote.com
Global employment platform providing Employer of Record, contractor management, and global payroll services for companies hiring internationally across borders and jurisdictions.
Last updated: 2025-03-05
Remote.com is a global employment platform founded in 2019 in San Francisco, built as a direct competitor to Deel. It handles contractor payments, employer of record services, and global payroll — with a key differentiator being that Remote owns its legal entities in 80+ countries rather than relying entirely on third-party partners.
Our Honest Take
Remote.com's main selling point versus Deel is its owned-entity model. In 80+ countries, Remote.com operates its own local legal entities rather than subcontracting to local partners. This theoretically gives better control over compliance, employee experience, and IP protection — a meaningful consideration for companies in regulated industries or those concerned about intellectual property assignment. Contractor management starts at $29 per contractor per month, and the platform handles multi-currency payments, compliant contracts, and tax documentation.
The EOR pricing matches Deel at $599 per employee per month, which carries the same cost concern at scale. Country coverage, while strong at 80+ owned entities, is narrower than Deel's 150+ (which includes partner entities). This means for some less common markets, Deel may be the only option. The platform is younger and still building out features — HR functionality beyond payroll and compliance is basic, and the integration ecosystem is less developed than Deel's. Customer support reviews suggest the team is responsive but the platform can be less polished on edge cases in newer markets.
Remote.com is the right choice for companies that prioritise owned legal entities over breadth of country coverage. If IP protection and compliance transparency are critical (common in tech and biotech), the owned-entity model has real appeal. For companies that just need the widest country coverage and fastest setup, Deel's larger network usually wins. Getting quotes from both is standard practice — pricing often varies by country and volume.
Who This Is Best For
- Tech and IP-sensitive companies that want their EOR provider to own local entities rather than use third-party partners for stronger IP protection
- Companies hiring in Remote.com's 80+ owned-entity countries who value direct compliance control and local legal expertise
- Teams managing international contractors at $29/contractor/month who want a reliable alternative to Deel
- Companies in regulated industries (biotech, fintech) where the compliance transparency of owned entities matters more than maximum country coverage
- HR leaders comparing EOR providers who want to negotiate between Deel and Remote.com for the best terms on their specific country mix
Who Should Look Elsewhere
- Companies needing 100+ country coverage — Deel's network (150+ countries via partners) is significantly broader than Remote's 80+ owned entities
- US-only companies that need domestic payroll — Gusto or OnPay are simpler and more cost-effective for purely domestic operations
- Teams that need a full HRIS alongside global payroll — Remote.com, like Deel, is not a people management platform; pair it with BambooHR or HiBob
- Budget-conscious startups paying only a few contractors — Deel's free contractor plan undercuts Remote's $29/contractor/month fee
Overview
Remote.com is a global employment platform developed by Remote Technology Inc., founded in 2019 and headquartered in San Francisco. The tool positions itself as a comprehensive solution for companies managing international workforces, combining three core capabilities: Employer of Record (EOR) services, contractor management, and global payroll processing. Rather than functioning solely as a traditional HRIS, Remote.com bridges the gap between HR management and international employment compliance, making it particularly suited for companies navigating multi-jurisdictional hiring challenges.
The platform is designed to handle the complexity of employing people across different countries and legal frameworks. This means it goes beyond standard employee data management to address issues like cross-border tax compliance, local labor law adherence, and jurisdiction-specific payroll requirements. The inclusion of EEO/OFCCP and GDPR compliance features reflects this international focus, suggesting the tool is built with regulatory complexity in mind rather than as a general-purpose HR solution.
Who Should Use Remote.com?
-
Companies with international hiring needs: Organizations actively hiring remote workers, contractors, or full-time employees across multiple countries will find Remote.com's EOR and global payroll capabilities most valuable. This includes startups scaling globally and established companies expanding into new markets.
-
Distributed and remote-first companies: Teams with employees scattered across different jurisdictions benefit from centralized payroll, compliance management, and contractor tracking—features that reduce administrative overhead and legal risk.
-
Mid-market to enterprise organizations: While Remote.com targets "all companies," the complexity of its feature set (API access, workflow automation, multiple integrations) suggests it's best suited for organizations with dedicated HR/People teams rather than small businesses with minimal HR infrastructure.
-
Companies managing both employees and contractors: The dual focus on traditional employment and contractor management makes Remote.com particularly relevant for organizations that rely on a mix of full-time staff and independent contractors across borders.
The Bottom Line
Remote.com addresses a genuine pain point for companies operating internationally—the fragmented landscape of payroll, compliance, and employment management across jurisdictions. Its 4.5/5 rating suggests users value the platform's ability to consolidate these functions — though companies should also evaluate how it compares to Deel and Rippling — and the integration ecosystem (Slack, Zapier, API access) indicates reasonable flexibility for companies with existing tech stacks. The inclusion of a mobile app and automated workflows adds practical convenience for distributed teams.
However, the lack of publicly available pricing and the absence of documented user feedback on specific strengths and weaknesses makes it difficult to assess cost-effectiveness or real-world performance. Organizations considering Remote.com should view it as a specialized tool for international workforce management rather than a replacement for traditional HRIS platforms. It's most appropriate if your primary challenge is managing employees and contractors across borders—not if you need comprehensive HR features like applicant tracking or performance management. Request a detailed demo and pricing breakdown before committing, and clarify exactly which compliance and payroll scenarios your specific jurisdictions require. For a broader comparison, see our best EOR services guide.
Remote.com Pricing
Contractor Management
Pay contractors in 170+ countries
Employer of Record
Hire full-time globally
Global Payroll
Consolidate payroll across entities
Contact vendor for current pricing.
UnverifiedRemote.com Features
AI & Automation
Analytics
Compliance
Integrations
Mobile
Remote.com Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Strong alternative to Deel for global hiring
- + Owns entities in 80+ countries (not third-party)
- + Good IP protection and compliance
- + Contractor and EOR management in one platform
Cons
- - EOR pricing expensive at $599/employee/month
- - HR features beyond payroll are limited
- - Newer platform — still building out features
- - Country coverage less than Deel in some regions
How we evaluate tools
Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Remote.com differ from Deel?
The biggest difference is the entity model. Remote.com owns its legal entities in 80+ countries; Deel covers 150+ countries but uses a mix of owned and third-party partner entities. Remote's approach gives more direct control over compliance and IP protection. Deel's broader network covers more markets. Both charge $599/employee/month for EOR.
Is Remote.com's contractor plan free like Deel's?
No. Remote.com charges $29 per contractor per month, whereas Deel offers free contractor management. For teams paying a large number of contractors, this cost difference adds up. Remote's contractor plan does include more compliance features, but Deel's free tier is hard to beat on price.
Can Remote.com handle payroll in any country?
Remote.com operates payroll through its owned entities in 80+ countries. If the country you need is covered, payroll runs through Remote's own infrastructure. For countries outside this list, you'd need a different provider. Check Remote's country list against your specific hiring locations before committing.
Does Remote.com replace an HRIS?
No. Like Deel, Remote.com handles global payroll, compliance, and employment — but not core HRIS functions like performance management, engagement surveys, or people analytics. Most companies pair Remote.com with a dedicated HRIS like BambooHR, HiBob, or Personio.
Remote.com Integrations
Remote.com connects with 12 tools and platforms.
Communication
HRIS
Calendar
CRM
Productivity
SSO/Security
Company Info
- Company
- Remote Technology Inc.
- Founded
- 2019
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Deployment
- Cloud
Review Ratings
Featured Comparisons
Buying Guides
Get the Shortlist Spreadsheet
130 tools compared — ratings, pricing, and free plans in one CSV. Plus weekly updates.