Codility vs Pymetrics (now Harver)

A detailed comparison of Codility and Pymetrics (now Harver). See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

Codility Pymetrics (now Harver)
Rating 4.6/5 4.0/5
Starting Price N/A N/A
Free Trial Yes No
Free Plan No No
Features 8 8
Best For Mid-Market Enterprise

Codility

Technical assessment platform for evaluating developer skills through coding challenges, real-world tasks, and live technical interviews with code playback.

Rating 4.6/5
Best for Mid-Market
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.

Rating 4.0/5
Best for Enterprise
Free trial No
Free plan No
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver) →

Feature Comparison

Feature Codility Pymetrics (now Harver)
AI Candidate Matching
AI Resume Screening
Reporting Dashboard
API Access
HRIS Integration
Zapier Integration
Skills Assessment
Video Screening

Pricing Comparison

Codility

Starter Custom
Business Custom
Enterprise Custom

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pricing not publicly listed.

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

Gmail Google Workspace Outlook Zapier

Only Codility

Google Calendar Microsoft 365 Okta Outlook Calendar Slack

Pros & Cons

Codility

Pros

  • +Reliable, well-structured coding assessments
  • +Plagiarism detection and anti-cheating tools
  • +Good for screening large volumes of tech candidates
  • +Integrates with most major ATS platforms

Cons

  • -Only useful for technical hiring
  • -Premium pricing for full feature access
  • -Assessment library not as broad as HackerRank
  • -UI feels dated compared to newer competitors

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pros

  • +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
  • +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
  • +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
  • +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively

Cons

  • -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
  • -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
  • -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
  • -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Codility if:

  • • Your company is Mid-Market size
  • • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.6 vs 4.0)
  • • Reliable, well-structured coding assessments
Try Codility Free

Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:

  • • Your company is Enterprise size
  • • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver)

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.