Manatal vs Workable

A detailed comparison of Manatal and Workable. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

Manatal Workable
Rating 4.8/5 4.5/5
Starting Price $15/mo $149/mo
Free Trial Yes Yes
Free Plan No Yes
Features 16 16
Best For SMB SMB

A genuine head-to-head for mid-market ATS buyers. Both tools target companies with 20-500 employees that need a modern ATS without enterprise complexity. This is one of the closer comparisons in the ATS category.

Manatal (rated 4.8/5) leads on affordability and AI. At $15/user/month, it's the cheapest capable ATS in the market. Key strengths: AI-powered candidate scoring and recommendations, social media profile enrichment, CRM functionality for agencies, and a clean interface. It also supports recruitment agency workflows with client management. Founded in Bangkok with a strong presence in Asia-Pacific and growing globally.

Workable (rated 4.5/5) leads on hiring infrastructure. Its sourcing tools include a built-in people search engine with 400M+ candidate profiles, AI-assisted job description writing, one-click posting to 200+ job boards, and a strong referral programme. Video interviews and offer management are built in. Pricing starts around $149/month (Starter) to $299/month (Standard) for small teams. More established in US and European markets.

Choose Manatal for the best value ATS with AI sourcing and CRM, especially for agencies or budget-conscious teams. Choose Workable for a more mature hiring infrastructure with built-in sourcing, job distribution, and larger market presence.

Editor's Note

This is a real decision for teams in the 20-200 employee range. Manatal wins on price ($15/user vs $149-299/month) and AI features. Workable wins on sourcing depth (400M+ candidate database) and hiring infrastructure (job distribution, video interviews, onboarding). If price is the primary concern, Manatal. If you need an all-in-one hiring platform, Workable. Breezy HR is the third option worth considering in this range — free plan plus strong automation.

Key Differences

The fundamental difference lies in pricing model: Manatal charges per user ($15–$55/month), while Workable uses flat-rate pricing ($149–$599/month). For budget-conscious SMBs hiring sporadically, Manatal's lower entry point and scalability make it more cost-effective, though Workable's flat rate becomes advantageous if you need multiple concurrent users. Both offer AI-powered features, but Workable emphasizes built-in video interviews and assessments, while Manatal differentiates with social media profile enrichment and stronger positioning for recruitment agencies.

When to Choose Manatal

  • Small agencies and lean recruiting teams. At $15/user/month, Manatal lets you add team members without proportional cost explosion—ideal if you're running 3–5 person recruitment operations or managing multiple client accounts simultaneously.

  • Cost-conscious startups with variable hiring needs. If your hiring is seasonal or project-based, Manatal's per-user model means you only pay for active recruiters; Workable's $149 minimum monthly spend may be wasteful during quiet periods.

  • Companies that value social intelligence. Manatal's social media enrichment feature automatically pulls LinkedIn and other profile data, saving time on manual research—particularly useful for passive candidate sourcing in competitive markets.

  • Agencies needing multi-client job board posting. Manatal is explicitly designed for recruitment agencies, making it simpler to manage multiple job boards and candidate pipelines across different clients.

When to Choose Workable

  • Organizations prioritizing built-in assessments and video interviews. Workable includes these tools natively, eliminating the need for third-party integrations—critical if your hiring process depends on skills testing or asynchronous video screening.

  • Companies comfortable with predictable, flat-rate budgets. If you have a stable recruitment team of 3–5 people, Workable's $360/month Standard tier may actually be cheaper than paying multiple Manatal users, and budgeting is simpler.

  • Teams that value ease of setup. Workable's reputation for immediate usability matters if you need a fast deployment with minimal configuration; Manatal's simplicity is comparable, but Workable's AI sourcing feels more turnkey.

  • Mid-market companies scaling beyond SMB. Workable's Premier tier ($599/month) is designed for growing organizations; Manatal's enterprise pricing ($55/user) becomes prohibitively expensive at scale compared to Workable's flat tier.

Verdict

Manatal is the stronger choice for resource-constrained SMBs and recruitment agencies, offering superior affordability and social enrichment capabilities. Workable wins for organizations that need built-in assessments, video interviews, and predictable budgeting, plus it offers a free plan for basic hiring. Choose Manatal if you're hiring sporadically or managing multiple clients on a tight budget; choose Workable if you need integrated assessment tools and can commit to predictable monthly spend.

Manatal

AI-powered ATS and recruitment CRM with social media enrichment. Very affordable with strong feature set for small teams and agencies.

Rating 4.8/5
Best for SMB
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Workable

All-in-one recruiting platform with AI-powered sourcing, job board posting, and built-in assessments. Popular with growing companies.

Rating 4.5/5
Best for SMB
Free trial Yes
Free plan Yes
Start Free Trial →

Feature Comparison

Feature Manatal Workable
Workflow Automation
Reporting Dashboard
Time-to-Hire Tracking
Interview Feedback
Team Scorecards
Email Templates
GDPR Compliance
Candidate Pipeline
Career Page Builder
Job Posting
Offer Management
Resume Parsing
API Access
Multi-Job Board Posting
Calendar Sync
Self-Scheduling

Pricing Comparison

Manatal

Professional $15/mo
Enterprise $35/mo
Enterprise Plus $55/mo
Custom Custom

Workable

Starter $149/mo
Standard $360/mo
Premier $599/mo

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

Glassdoor Gmail Google Calendar Google Workspace Indeed LinkedIn Monster Outlook Outlook Calendar Slack

Only Manatal

Mailchimp

Only Workable

Azure AD BambooHR Checkr Codility HackerRank Microsoft 365 Microsoft Teams Okta SHL Salesforce

Pros & Cons

Manatal

Pros

  • +Very affordable — starts at $15/user/month
  • +AI-powered candidate recommendations
  • +Social media profile enrichment
  • +Great for recruitment agencies and SMBs

Cons

  • -Less suited for large enterprises
  • -Integrations ecosystem smaller than competitors
  • -Reporting less advanced than premium tools
  • -Relatively new company (founded 2019)

Workable

Pros

  • +AI-powered candidate sourcing built in
  • +Easy to set up and use immediately
  • +Transparent, competitive pricing
  • +Built-in video interviews and assessments

Cons

  • -Analytics less deep than Greenhouse or Ashby
  • -Career page customisation limited
  • -Can get expensive at higher tiers
  • -CRM capabilities basic compared to dedicated CRMs

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Manatal if:

  • • Your company is SMB size
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.8 vs 4.5)
  • • Budget is a priority (starts from $15/mo vs $149/mo)
  • • Very affordable — starts at $15/user/month
Try Manatal Free

Choose Workable if:

  • • Your company is SMB size
  • • You want to start with a free plan
  • • AI-powered candidate sourcing built in
Try Workable Free

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Manatal rated higher than Workable?

Manatal (4.8/5) gets exceptional ratings relative to its price point — users are impressed by what they get for $15/user/month. Workable (4.5/5) is rated by buyers with higher expectations who compare it to enterprise tools. Both are well-regarded; the rating gap reflects value perception more than absolute quality.

Which is better for high-volume hiring?

Workable. Its built-in sourcing database (400M+ profiles), one-click multi-board posting, and structured hiring workflows are designed for high-volume recruiting. Manatal handles volume adequately but lacks the sourcing database depth and job distribution breadth.

Can Manatal handle agency recruiting?

Yes — Manatal includes client management and agency-specific CRM features. Workable is designed for in-house teams and doesn't support multi-client agency workflows. If you're an agency, Manatal (or Recruit CRM for larger agencies) is the better fit.

Which integrates with more tools?

Workable has a larger integration ecosystem, including native connections to major HRIS platforms, background check providers, and assessment tools. Manatal's integration list is growing but smaller. Both support Zapier for extending connectivity.

Building a shortlist?

Download our spreadsheet with 130 tools compared — ratings, pricing, free plans, and categories. Makes evaluation easier.

Free download. No spam. Includes pricing, ratings, and free plan data for 130 tools.

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.