Criteria Corp vs Pymetrics (now Harver)
A detailed comparison of Criteria Corp and Pymetrics (now Harver). See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.
At a Glance
| Criteria Corp | Pymetrics (now Harver) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Starting Price | N/A | N/A |
| Free Trial | Yes | No |
| Free Plan | No | No |
| Features | 8 | 8 |
| Best For | All | Enterprise |
Criteria Corp
Pre-employment testing platform offering aptitude, personality, risk, and skills assessments backed by industrial-organisational psychology research.
Rating
4.5/5
Best for
All
Free trial
Yes
Free plan
No
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.
Rating
4.0/5
Best for
Enterprise
Free trial
No
Free plan
No
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Criteria Corp | Pymetrics (now Harver) |
|---|---|---|
| AI Candidate Matching | ||
| AI Resume Screening | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| API Access | ||
| HRIS Integration | ||
| Zapier Integration | ||
| Skills Assessment | ||
| Video Screening |
Integrations
Both tools integrate with
Gmail
Google Workspace
Outlook
Zapier
Pros & Cons
Criteria Corp
Pros
- +Scientifically validated assessments backed by industrial-organizational psychology research
- +Comprehensive candidate evaluation covering aptitude, personality, skills, and risk factors
- +Reduces hiring bias and improves quality of early-stage candidate screening
- +Customizable tests allow tailoring assessments to specific job requirements
Cons
- -High cost per assessment limits usage for high-volume recruiting operations
- -Steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with industrial-organizational psychology
- -Some candidates find personality and risk assessments invasive or overly lengthy
- -Limited integration with popular ATS platforms compared to competing solutions
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Pros
- +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
- +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
- +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
- +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively
Cons
- -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
- -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
- -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
- -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Criteria Corp if:
- • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
- • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.5 vs 4.0)
- • Scientifically validated assessments backed by industrial-organizational psychology research
Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:
- • Your company is Enterprise size
- • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
How we evaluate tools
Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.
Criteria Corp review
Pymetrics (now Harver) review
Criteria Corp alternatives
Pymetrics (now Harver) alternatives