Crosschq vs Gem

A detailed comparison of Crosschq and Gem. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

Crosschq Gem
Rating 4.3/5 4.6/5
Starting Price N/A N/A
Free Trial Yes Yes
Free Plan No No
Features 6 16
Best For Mid-Market Mid-Market

Key Differences

Crosschq and Gem share 6 features. Gem has 8+ unique features.

Only in Gem

  • AI Candidate Matching
  • Workflow Automation
  • Bulk Messaging
  • Email Templates
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Candidate Pipeline
  • Employer Branding
  • Boolean Search

Crosschq

Hiring intelligence platform combining reference checking, quality-of-hire analytics, and talent sourcing to help companies measure and improve recruitment outcomes over time.

Rating 4.3/5
Best for Mid-Market
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Gem

Talent engagement platform combining sourcing CRM, outreach automation, and pipeline analytics, providing end-to-end visibility into recruiting performance and team productivity.

Rating 4.6/5
Best for Mid-Market
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Feature Comparison

Feature Crosschq Gem
DEI Analytics
Reporting Dashboard
Source Analytics
Time-to-Hire Tracking
API Access
HRIS Integration
AI Candidate Matching
Workflow Automation
Bulk Messaging
Email Templates
GDPR Compliance
Candidate Pipeline
Employer Branding
Boolean Search
Chrome Extension
LinkedIn Integration

Pricing Comparison

Crosschq

Pricing not publicly listed.

Gem

Platform Custom
Enterprise Custom

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

BambooHR Gmail Google Calendar Google Workspace Outlook Outlook Calendar Slack Workday Zapier

Only Gem

Calendly LinkedIn Microsoft 365 Okta Salesforce

Pros & Cons

Crosschq

Pros

  • +Streamlines reference checking process with automated workflows and candidate tracking
  • +Provides actionable quality-of-hire analytics to measure recruitment success metrics
  • +Reduces time spent on manual reference checks through intelligent automation
  • +Integrates well with major ATS platforms like Workday, Greenhouse, and iCIMS

Cons

  • -Reference checks still require candidate consent, limiting control over process
  • -Setup and configuration can be complex for teams without dedicated HR tech staff
  • -Pricing increases significantly as company scales hiring volume
  • -Limited functionality for technical skills assessment or specialized hiring

Gem

Pros

  • +Best-in-class CRM for sourcing and nurturing
  • +Deep email sequencing and tracking
  • +Strong analytics on talent pipeline
  • +Excellent Greenhouse and other ATS integrations

Cons

  • -Expensive — enterprise pricing only
  • -Not a standalone ATS — requires integration
  • -Learning curve for full platform utilisation
  • -Overkill for small recruiting teams

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Crosschq if:

  • • Your company is Mid-Market size
  • • Streamlines reference checking process with automated workflows and candidate tracking
Try Crosschq Free

Choose Gem if:

  • • Your company is Mid-Market size
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.6 vs 4.3)
  • • You need a more feature-rich solution (16 vs 6 features)
  • • Best-in-class CRM for sourcing and nurturing
Try Gem Free

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.