Lever
Combined ATS and CRM (LeverTRM) that unifies sourcing, nurturing, and hiring. Strong for relationship-driven recruiting.
Last updated: 2026-04-02 19:21:39
Lever is the ATS that doubles as a talent CRM, founded in 2012 in San Francisco. Branded as a Talent Relationship Management (TRM) platform, it combines applicant tracking with nurture campaigns and diversity tools — targeting mid-market companies that want to build long-term candidate pipelines rather than just process applications.
Our Honest Take
Lever's core differentiator is genuine: the ATS and CRM are unified in a single system rather than bolted together. This means recruiters can track active applicants and nurture passive candidates from the same interface, with shared context and history. The nurture campaign functionality lets teams build drip sequences for candidates who aren't ready to apply yet, which is valuable for competitive talent markets where relationship building matters.
The D&I tooling is another strength. Lever offers anonymised resume reviews, EEO survey collection, and diversity pipeline reporting that goes beyond basic compliance checkboxes. For companies with genuine diversity hiring goals, this is useful and relatively well-implemented compared to competitors.
The downsides are real, though. Pricing is custom and opaque, with typical contracts running $3,000 to $15,000+ per year — comparable to Greenhouse but without a free trial to evaluate before committing to a sales cycle. The reporting and analytics, while adequate, lack the depth and visual polish of Ashby's analytics-first approach. And the structured hiring methodology is less prescriptive than Greenhouse's scorecard-driven framework, so teams that want the platform to enforce process discipline may find Lever too flexible.
Lever fits best when your recruiting strategy centres on relationship building and candidate nurturing rather than high-volume application processing. Greenhouse is the better pick for compliance-heavy, structured hiring; Ashby is the modern alternative offering stronger analytics.
Who This Is Best For
- Mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) that recruit heavily from passive candidate pools and need CRM functionality built into their ATS
- Recruiting teams running nurture campaigns that want drip sequences and candidate engagement tracking in a single platform
- Companies with active D&I hiring initiatives that need anonymised reviews, EEO data collection, and diversity pipeline reporting
- Talent acquisition teams that value relationship continuity — keeping candidate history and context intact across multiple roles and interactions over time
Who Should Look Elsewhere
- Companies that need rigid, structured hiring processes — Greenhouse's scorecard methodology is more prescriptive and compliance-oriented
- Small businesses or startups under 30 employees — the custom pricing and sales process are heavy for small teams; Workable or Ashby's free plan are better fits
- Teams that prioritise analytics and reporting depth — Ashby's analytics-first design offers more powerful recruiting insights out of the box
Overview
Lever is a combined Applicant Tracking System (ATS) and Candidate Relationship Management platform (LeverTRM) developed by Employ Inc., founded in 2012 and based in San Francisco. Unlike traditional ATS tools that focus primarily on job posting and candidate filtering, Lever integrates sourcing, candidate nurturing, and hiring workflows into a single interface—positioning itself as a platform built for relationship-driven recruiting teams. The platform targets mid-market companies with 50–500+ employees who need more sophisticated pipeline management than basic job boards but want to avoid managing multiple disconnected tools.
The core differentiator is the unified ATS/CRM model. This means recruiting teams can post jobs, source candidates, maintain long-term relationships with prospects who aren't ready to apply, move candidates through interview stages, and manage offers—all within one system. The interface is modern and intuitive, with features like self-scheduling, calendar sync, team scorecards for interview feedback, and built-in DEI analytics. Lever also includes workflow automation, API access for integration with other systems, and GDPR compliance for international teams.
Who Should Use Lever?
-
Growth-stage and mid-market companies (100–1,000 employees) with high-volume or specialized hiring needs who want to reduce time-to-hire and improve candidate experience through seamless communication.
-
Sourcing-focused recruiting teams that spend significant time on outbound recruitment, passive candidate nurturing, and relationship building—rather than relying solely on job board applicants.
-
Organizations prioritizing talent brand and DEI that need built-in analytics, career page customization, and tools to track diversity metrics across the hiring funnel.
-
Teams requiring ATS/CRM consolidation who want to eliminate the friction of switching between separate sourcing platforms and applicant tracking systems, and can justify custom pricing for unified functionality.
The Bottom Line
Lever is a solid, modern ATS with a genuine strength in candidate relationship management—particularly valuable for companies where sourcing and nurturing are strategic recruiting functions rather than afterthoughts. The clean interface and integrated workflow make it easy for teams to move between sourcing, outreach, and hiring without losing context. However, the lack of transparent pricing, absence of a free trial, and limited reporting on lower-tier plans create friction in the evaluation and buying process. Budget-conscious teams should see how Lever compares to Manatal for a more affordable alternative. Mobile app capabilities lag behind desktop functionality, and the platform's transition to Employ Inc. ownership raises questions about long-term product direction and roadmap clarity.
Lever is best suited for mid-market companies with dedicated recruiting teams and budgets for custom pricing, where the ATS/CRM integration justifies the investment over cheaper single-function tools. It's less ideal for small startups evaluating costs, companies with simple hiring needs, or organizations requiring out-of-the-box reporting and transparency. Teams evaluating enterprise-grade options should also consider Greenhouse. Request a demo and detailed pricing before committing, and confirm feature availability at your expected user tier.
Lever Pricing
LeverTRM
Custom pricing. Estimated $3,500-$20,000/year depending on headcount.
LeverTRM for Enterprise
Advanced security, analytics, and dedicated CSM.
Contact vendor for current pricing.
UnverifiedLever Features
AI & Automation
Analytics
Collaboration
Communication
Compliance
Core ATS
Integrations
Job Distribution
Scheduling
Lever Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Combined ATS + CRM in one platform (LeverTRM)
- + Clean, modern interface
- + Strong candidate relationship nurturing
- + Good sourcing and pipeline management
- + DEI analytics built in
Cons
- - Custom pricing only — not transparent
- - Reporting can be limited on lower tiers
- - No free trial or free plan
- - Part of Employ Inc. — product roadmap uncertainty
- - Mobile app functionality limited
How we evaluate tools
Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Lever cost?
Lever uses custom pricing with no published rates. Typical contracts range from $3,000 to $15,000+ per year depending on company size and features. There is no free plan or free trial — evaluation requires engaging with sales.
What is a Talent Relationship Management (TRM) platform?
TRM combines traditional applicant tracking (managing active job applications) with CRM functionality (nurturing passive candidates over time). Lever coined the term to describe its unified approach where recruiters manage both active and passive candidates in a single system, with shared history and automated nurture campaigns.
How does Lever compare to Greenhouse?
Lever is stronger on CRM and candidate nurturing, with built-in drip campaigns and D&I tooling. Greenhouse is stronger on structured hiring methodology, compliance reporting (EEOC/OFCCP), and integration breadth (400+ integrations). Both target similar company sizes at comparable price points. The choice usually comes down to whether your priority is relationship building (Lever) or process rigour (Greenhouse).
Lever Integrations
Lever connects with 28 tools and platforms.
Job Board
Communication
HRIS
Calendar
Assessment
Background Check
CRM
Productivity
SSO/Security
Payroll
Company Info
- Company
- Lever (Employ Inc.)
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Deployment
- Cloud
Review Ratings
Featured Comparisons
Buying Guides
Get the Shortlist Spreadsheet
130 tools compared — ratings, pricing, and free plans in one CSV. Plus weekly updates.