ApplicantPro vs Greenhouse (HRIS)

A detailed comparison of ApplicantPro and Greenhouse (HRIS). See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

ApplicantPro Greenhouse (HRIS)
Rating 4.6/5 4.5/5
Starting Price $90/mo N/A
Free Trial Yes No
Free Plan No No
Features 16 16
Best For SMB Mid-Market

ApplicantPro

Applicant tracking built for small to mid-sized businesses. Job posting, screening questions, and WOTC tax credit processing.

Rating 4.6/5
Best for SMB
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Greenhouse (HRIS)

Greenhouse Onboarding product that extends the ATS into structured onboarding workflows, task management, and new hire paperwork.

Rating 4.5/5
Best for Mid-Market
Free trial No
Free plan No
Visit Greenhouse (HRIS) →

Feature Comparison

Feature ApplicantPro Greenhouse (HRIS)
Workflow Automation
Reporting Dashboard
Time-to-Hire Tracking
Interview Feedback
Team Scorecards
Email Templates
GDPR Compliance
Candidate Pipeline
Career Page Builder
Job Posting
Offer Management
Resume Parsing
API Access
Multi-Job Board Posting
Calendar Sync
Self-Scheduling

Pricing Comparison

ApplicantPro

Standard $90/mo
Professional $190/mo

Greenhouse (HRIS)

Pricing not publicly listed.

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

Glassdoor Gmail Google Calendar Google Workspace Indeed LinkedIn Microsoft Teams Outlook Outlook Calendar Slack

Pros & Cons

ApplicantPro

Pros

  • +Affordable ATS for small businesses
  • +Built-in job board posting
  • +EEOC/OFCCP compliance features
  • +Straightforward, no-frills interface

Cons

  • -Interface feels dated
  • -Limited advanced automation
  • -Fewer integrations than modern ATS tools
  • -Reporting could be more robust

Greenhouse (HRIS)

Pros

  • +Seamless integration between ATS and onboarding reduces data entry and hiring handoff friction
  • +Strong candidate experience with intuitive interface and mobile-friendly application throughout hiring process
  • +Customizable workflows and task management enable companies to standardize onboarding processes effectively
  • +Robust reporting and analytics provide valuable insights into hiring metrics and pipeline visibility

Cons

  • -Pricing is relatively high compared to competitors, especially for smaller mid-market companies
  • -Implementation requires significant setup time and change management for mid-market organizations
  • -Support response times can be slow during peak hiring seasons for mid-market accounts
  • -Onboarding module integration gaps remain; some legacy HR systems don't connect smoothly

Which Should You Choose?

Choose ApplicantPro if:

  • • Your company is SMB size
  • • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.6 vs 4.5)
  • • Affordable ATS for small businesses
Try ApplicantPro Free

Choose Greenhouse (HRIS) if:

  • • Your company is Mid-Market size
  • • Seamless integration between ATS and onboarding reduces data entry and hiring handoff friction
Visit Greenhouse (HRIS)

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.