eSkill vs Pymetrics (now Harver)

A detailed comparison of eSkill and Pymetrics (now Harver). See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

eSkill Pymetrics (now Harver)
Rating 4.5/5 4.0/5
Starting Price N/A N/A
Free Trial Yes No
Free Plan No No
Features 8 8
Best For SMB Enterprise

eSkill

Customisable pre-employment skills testing platform with 1,000+ modular job-specific and subject-specific assessments for non-technical and technical roles.

Rating 4.5/5
Best for SMB
Free trial Yes
Free plan No
Start Free Trial →

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.

Rating 4.0/5
Best for Enterprise
Free trial No
Free plan No
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver) →

Feature Comparison

Feature eSkill Pymetrics (now Harver)
AI Candidate Matching
AI Resume Screening
Reporting Dashboard
API Access
HRIS Integration
Zapier Integration
Skills Assessment
Video Screening

Pricing Comparison

eSkill

Standard Custom
Enterprise Custom

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pricing not publicly listed.

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

Gmail Google Workspace Outlook Zapier

Pros & Cons

eSkill

Pros

  • +Extensive library of 1,000+ customizable assessments covering diverse roles and skills
  • +Reduces hiring time by quickly identifying qualified candidates through objective testing
  • +Works well for both technical and non-technical positions with job-specific tests
  • +Affordable pricing makes it accessible for small to medium-sized businesses

Cons

  • -Limited integration options with popular ATS platforms creates workflow friction
  • -Customization requires technical knowledge; not intuitive for non-technical HR staff
  • -Customer support responsiveness inconsistent; slower resolution during peak hiring seasons
  • -Assessment results lack detailed skill gap analysis and coaching recommendations

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pros

  • +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
  • +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
  • +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
  • +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively

Cons

  • -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
  • -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
  • -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
  • -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow

Which Should You Choose?

Choose eSkill if:

  • • Your company is SMB size
  • • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.5 vs 4.0)
  • • Extensive library of 1,000+ customizable assessments covering diverse roles and skills
Try eSkill Free

Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:

  • • Your company is Enterprise size
  • • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver)

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.