HackerRank vs Pymetrics (now Harver)

A detailed comparison of HackerRank and Pymetrics (now Harver). See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.

At a Glance

HackerRank Pymetrics (now Harver)
Rating 4.5/5 4.0/5
Starting Price $100/mo N/A
Free Trial Yes No
Free Plan Yes No
Features 8 8
Best For All Enterprise

HackerRank

Developer skills assessment platform combining coding challenges, real-world project assessments, and AI-powered technical interviews used by over 3,000 companies.

Rating 4.5/5
Best for All
Free trial Yes
Free plan Yes
Start Free Trial →

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.

Rating 4.0/5
Best for Enterprise
Free trial No
Free plan No
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver) →

Feature Comparison

Feature HackerRank Pymetrics (now Harver)
AI Candidate Matching
AI Resume Screening
Reporting Dashboard
API Access
HRIS Integration
Zapier Integration
Skills Assessment
Video Screening

Pricing Comparison

HackerRank

Starter $100/mo
Pro $450/mo
Enterprise Custom

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pricing not publicly listed.

Integrations

Both tools integrate with

Gmail Google Workspace Outlook Zapier

Only HackerRank

Google Calendar Microsoft 365 Okta Outlook Calendar Slack

Pros & Cons

HackerRank

Pros

  • +Industry standard for technical coding assessments
  • +Large library of coding challenges and exercises
  • +Supports 40+ programming languages
  • +CodePair for live collaborative coding interviews

Cons

  • -Expensive for smaller companies
  • -Focused on engineering — limited for non-tech roles
  • -Candidate experience can feel intimidating
  • -Some candidates game the system with known questions

Pymetrics (now Harver)

Pros

  • +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
  • +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
  • +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
  • +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively

Cons

  • -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
  • -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
  • -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
  • -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow

Which Should You Choose?

Choose HackerRank if:

  • • You want to start with a free plan
  • • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
  • • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.5 vs 4.0)
  • • Industry standard for technical coding assessments
Try HackerRank Free

Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:

  • • Your company is Enterprise size
  • • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
Visit Pymetrics (now Harver)

How we evaluate tools

Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.