Pymetrics (now Harver) vs SHL
A detailed comparison of Pymetrics (now Harver) and SHL. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.
At a Glance
| Pymetrics (now Harver) | SHL | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Starting Price | N/A | N/A |
| Free Trial | No | No |
| Free Plan | No | No |
| Features | 8 | 8 |
| Best For | Enterprise | Enterprise |
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.
SHL
Global leader in psychometric assessments and talent analytics, offering cognitive, personality, behavioural, and skills tests backed by decades of I/O psychology research.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Pymetrics (now Harver) | SHL |
|---|---|---|
| AI Candidate Matching | ||
| AI Resume Screening | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| API Access | ||
| HRIS Integration | ||
| Zapier Integration | ||
| Skills Assessment | ||
| Video Screening |
Integrations
Both tools integrate with
Only Pymetrics (now Harver)
Only SHL
Pros & Cons
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Pros
- +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
- +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
- +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
- +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively
Cons
- -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
- -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
- -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
- -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow
SHL
Pros
- +Scientifically rigorous assessments backed by decades of I/O psychology research and validation
- +Comprehensive talent analytics provide deep insights into candidate cognitive abilities and personality
- +Reduces bias in hiring by using objective, standardized measurement across all candidates equally
- +Scales effectively across global enterprises with multi-language support and localized assessments
Cons
- -High pricing makes SHL prohibitively expensive for mid-market and small organizations
- -Steep learning curve and complex platform navigation frustrates HR teams during initial implementation
- -Candidates often report assessments as overly long, tedious, and negatively impacting candidate experience
- -Customer support response times can be slow, with limited real-time assistance available
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:
- • Your company is Enterprise size
- • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
Choose SHL if:
- • Your company is Enterprise size
- • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.5 vs 4.0)
- • Scientifically rigorous assessments backed by decades of I/O psychology research and validation
How we evaluate tools
Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.