Pymetrics (now Harver) vs Wonderlic
A detailed comparison of Pymetrics (now Harver) and Wonderlic. See how they stack up on features, pricing, and user ratings.
At a Glance
| Pymetrics (now Harver) | Wonderlic | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Starting Price | N/A | N/A |
| Free Trial | No | Yes |
| Free Plan | No | No |
| Features | 8 | 8 |
| Best For | Enterprise | All |
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Neuroscience-based soft skills assessment platform using gamified cognitive and behavioural games to evaluate candidates while reducing bias in hiring.
Wonderlic
One of the oldest pre-employment testing providers, now offering modern online cognitive ability, personality, and motivation assessments with the WonScore platform.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Pymetrics (now Harver) | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| AI Candidate Matching | ||
| AI Resume Screening | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| API Access | ||
| HRIS Integration | ||
| Zapier Integration | ||
| Skills Assessment | ||
| Video Screening |
Pricing Comparison
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Pricing not publicly listed.
Wonderlic
Integrations
Both tools integrate with
Pros & Cons
Pymetrics (now Harver)
Pros
- +Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
- +Gamified assessments engage candidates and reduce dropout rates compared to traditional screening
- +Scales screening process efficiently for high-volume enterprise recruiting needs
- +Neuroscience-based approach helps identify soft skills and cultural fit objectively
Cons
- -High pricing and implementation costs make it prohibitive for mid-market companies
- -Platform rebranding to Harver caused confusion and integration issues for existing customers
- -Game-based format may disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or those unfamiliar with gaming
- -Customer support responsiveness and onboarding quality reportedly inconsistent and slow
Wonderlic
Pros
- +Scientifically validated assessments with decades of research backing cognitive ability measurements
- +Quick administration time reduces candidate burden while maintaining predictive validity effectively
- +Comprehensive reporting provides actionable insights into candidate cognitive strengths and weaknesses
- +Fair and objective screening reduces unconscious bias in initial candidate evaluation process
Cons
- -Higher pricing compared to competitors limits accessibility for small businesses and startups
- -Some candidates report confusing interface design and unclear instructions during test administration
- -Limited customization options for tailoring assessments to specific industry or role requirements
- -Customer support response times and availability fall short of expectations during critical hiring periods
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Pymetrics (now Harver) if:
- • Your company is Enterprise size
- • Reduces unconscious bias in early-stage hiring decisions through standardized game-based evaluation
Choose Wonderlic if:
- • You want to try before committing (free trial available)
- • Higher user ratings matter to you (4.3 vs 4.0)
- • Scientifically validated assessments with decades of research backing cognitive ability measurements
How we evaluate tools
Our ratings combine verified user reviews from G2 and Capterra with hands-on feature analysis. Pricing is checked against official sources. We may earn a commission through affiliate links, but this never influences our rankings or recommendations. Read our full methodology.